vs
6.1Battery6.1
Why is h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 better than WF-XB700?
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2.5 h+67%
- Earbud weight (each)7.6 g vs 8 g+5%
Why is WF-XB700 better than h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800?
- Battery life8 h vs 9 h+12%
- Driver size6 mm vs 12 mm2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 12 mm |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 9 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| NFC pairing | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.6 g | 8 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods ProvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vsApple AirPods (3rd Gen)vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vsApple AirPods 3vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vsGoogle Pixel Buds A-SeriesvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vs
Sony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vsTechnics EAH-AZ70W