How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OpenRun USB-C vs SE215-EFS

Shokz OpenRun USB-C vs Shure SE215-EFS

What OpenRun USB-C does better (3) and where SE215-EFS wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Shokz OpenRun USB-C
Shokz · 2022OpenRun USB-C
6.6Score
3 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
vs
Shure SE215-EFS
Shure · 2020SE215-EFS
0 advantages≈ $110

Why is OpenRun USB-C better than SE215-EFS?

  1. Weight26 g vs 30 g+15%
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 17,500 Hz+14%
  3. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 22 Hz+10%

Why is SE215-EFS better than OpenRun USB-C?

SE215-EFS has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitBone conductionIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz22 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz17,500 Hz
Impedance8 Ω20 Ω
Sensitivity105 dB107 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h—
Battery capacity160 mAh—
Charging time1.5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5.1—
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight26 g30 g
Protection ratingIP67—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7—
Dust protection (IP)6—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare