vs
4.8Battery3.9
Why is IE 100 Pro Wireless better than OpenRun USB-C?
- Battery life10 h vs 8 h+25%
- aptXYes · OpenRun USB-C: No
- Lowest frequency18 Hz vs 20 Hz+11%
Why is OpenRun USB-C better than IE 100 Pro Wireless?
OpenRun USB-C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Neckband | Bone conduction |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 18 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 20 Ω | 8 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 115 dB | 105 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 8 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 160 mAh |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 26 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Sennheiser IE 100 Pro WirelessvsShokz OpenRun Provs
Sennheiser IE 100 Pro WirelessvsShokz OpenRun Minivs
Sennheiser IE 100 Pro WirelessvsCrosscall X-VIBESvs
Sennheiser IE 100 Pro WirelessvsSennheiser IE 100 Pro
vsShokz OpenMovevsSennheiser IE 100 Pro Wirelessvs
Sennheiser IE 100 Pro WirelessvsShure SE215-EFS