How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OpenRun USB-C vs OpenSwim

Shokz OpenRun USB-C vs Shokz OpenSwim

What OpenRun USB-C does better (2) and where OpenSwim wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Shokz OpenRun USB-C
Shokz · 2022OpenRun USB-C
6.6Score
2 advantages≈ $120
vs
Shokz OpenSwim
Shokz · 2022OpenSwim
6.9Score
2 advantages≈ $160
Higher score
3.9Battery3.2
8.2Build & features9.4

Why is OpenRun USB-C better than OpenSwim?

  1. Weight26 g vs 30 g+15%
  2. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is OpenSwim better than OpenRun USB-C?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
  2. Battery capacity160 mAh vs 183 mAh+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Shokz OpenSwimShokz OpenSwim≈ $1606.9
Sound
FitBone conductionBone conduction
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance8 Ω8 Ω
Sensitivity105 dB98 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h8 h
Battery capacity160 mAh183 mAh
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5.1—
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Weight26 g30 g
Protection ratingIP67IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx8
Dust protection (IP)66
Colours—Black, Blue
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare