vs
9.3Noise control & calls7.2
4.2Battery5.1
Why is Galaxy Buds 2 SM-R117 better than EAH-AZ70W?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Battery life8 h vs 7.5 h+7%
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is EAH-AZ70W better than Galaxy Buds 2 SM-R117?
- Battery life with ANC5 h vs 6.5 h+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 7.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5 h | 6.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 20 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsSamsung Galaxy Buds 2 SM-R1175.96.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 SM-R117vsSony WF-1000XM46.76.9
vs
Technics EAH-AZ70WvsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1
vs
Sony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vsTechnics EAH-AZ70W
vs
Technics EAH-AZ70WvsJBL LIVE 300TWS5.75.7
vs
Jabra Elite Active 75tvsTechnics EAH-AZ70W5.35.7
