vs
2.9Battery3.9
Why is Ne HP-R100BT better than OpenRun USB-C?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · OpenRun USB-C: No
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- aptXYes · OpenRun USB-C: No
- LDACYes · OpenRun USB-C: No
Why is OpenRun USB-C better than Ne HP-R100BT?
- Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Bone conduction |
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 7 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 8 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | 105 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 8 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 160 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 26 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
