vs
3.9Battery5.0
Why is Ne EXTRA HP-NX500BT better than CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1?
- Highest frequency45,000 Hz vs 21,000 Hz2.1×
- Charging time1 h vs 1.5 h+50%
- Driver size9.8 mm vs 7 mm+40%
Why is CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1 better than Ne EXTRA HP-NX500BT?
- Battery life5.5 h vs 7 h+27%
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 5 Hz2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 9.8 mm | 7 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 45,000 Hz | 21,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 114 dB | 107 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5.5 h | 7 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 12 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
