vs
3.9Battery6.2
Why is Ne EXTRA HP-NX500BT better than WF-XB700?
- Charging time1 h vs 2.5 h2.5×
- aptXYes · WF-XB700: No
Why is WF-XB700 better than Ne EXTRA HP-NX500BT?
- Battery life5.5 h vs 9 h+64%
- Driver size9.8 mm vs 12 mm+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 9.8 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 45,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 114 dB | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5.5 h | 9 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 8 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
