vs
2.3Battery7.7
Why is TAT2520 better than Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 100 Hz5×
Why is Hear-scape ear-hug HP-H10BT better than TAT2520?
- Battery life4 h vs 10 h2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 100 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB | 120 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 4 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 14 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 40 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5.7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
