Why is LBT-OWS01 better than TAT2520?
- Battery life10 h vs 4 h2.5×
- Driver size16 mm vs 10 mm+60%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is TAT2520 better than LBT-OWS01?
TAT2520 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver size | 16 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 4 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 4 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 14 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 40 mAh |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 9.8 g | — |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
