How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK vs TAT2520

Belkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK vs Philips TAT2520

What Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK does better (1) and where TAT2520 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Belkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK
1 advantage≈ $25
vs
Philips TAT2520
Philips · 2025TAT2520
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ $20
Higher score
3.0Noise control & calls5.4

Why is Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK better than TAT2520?

  1. Battery capacity90 mAh vs 40 mAh2.2×

Why is TAT2520 better than Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT2520Philips TAT2520≈ $204.6
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver size—10 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—107 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life—4 h
Battery life with ANC—4 h
Total with charging case—14 h
Battery capacity90 mAh40 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare