How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT1300 vs AUSTIN 2

Philips TAT1300 vs Urbanista AUSTIN 2

What TAT1300 does better (1) and where AUSTIN 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT1300
Philips · 2026TAT1300
4.1Score
1 advantage≈ $18
Higher score
vs
Urbanista AUSTIN 2
Urbanista · 2026AUSTIN 2
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ $20
3.1Noise control & calls3.1
2.7Battery2.4

Why is TAT1300 better than AUSTIN 2?

  1. Battery life6 h vs 5 h+20%

Why is AUSTIN 2 better than TAT1300?

  1. Driver size10 mm vs 13 mm+30%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT1300Philips TAT1300≈ $184.1
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm13 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance105 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity105 dB121 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h5 h
Total with charging case—25 h
Charging time3 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version66
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight34 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare