vs
Why is TAST702BK/98 better than TAT2205/00?
- Battery life6 h vs 4 h+50%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 200 Hz10×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is TAT2205/00 better than TAST702BK/98?
TAT2205/00 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 6 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 200 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 94 dB | 90 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 4 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 3.2 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
