vs
3.8Noise control & calls9.2
4.2Battery2.6
Why is TAH2000 better than HiTune S3 WS209?
- Battery life26 h vs 7 h3.7×
- Driver size40 mm vs 12 mm3.3×
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
Why is HiTune S3 WS209 better than TAH2000?
- Active noise cancellingNo · TAH2000: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 123 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 26 h | 7 h |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 15 min → 6 h | 15 min → 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
