vs
8.0Battery3.0
Why is TAE4205 better than TAST702BK/98?
- Battery life10 h vs 6 h+67%
- Driver size8.2 mm vs 6 mm+37%
Why is TAST702BK/98 better than TAE4205?
TAST702BK/98 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 8.2 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | 94 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 6 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 16 g | — |
| Protection rating | — | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
