vs
3.9Battery6.2
Why is RZ-S500W better than h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800?
- Driver size8 mm vs 6 mm+33%
Why is h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 better than RZ-S500W?
- Battery life6 h vs 8 h+33%
- Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 8 mm | 6 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| NFC pairing | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 7.6 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |







