How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Enco Free2 vs TAST702BK/98

OPPO Enco Free2 vs Philips TAST702BK/98

What Enco Free2 does better (3) and where TAST702BK/98 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

OPPO Enco Free2
OPPO · 2021Enco Free2
5.4Score
3 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
vs
Philips TAST702BK/98
Philips · 2020TAST702BK/98
1 advantage≈ $35
3.6Battery3.2

Why is Enco Free2 better than TAST702BK/98?

  1. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
  2. Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
  3. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is TAST702BK/98 better than Enco Free2?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

OPPO Enco Free2OPPO Enco Free2≈ $405.4
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity103 dB94 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h6 h
Battery life with ANC4 h—
Total with charging case30 h—
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Weight48 g—
Protection ratingIP54IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare