How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. R1 1.0 vs Aviator 900 ANC

OLLO R1 1.0 vs Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC

What R1 1.0 does better (2) and where Aviator 900 ANC wins (2) — every spec side by side.

OLLO R1 1.0
OLLO · 2025R1 1.0
2 advantages≈ $410
vs
Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC
Skullcandy · 2025Aviator 900 ANC
6.9Score
2 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls6.8

Why is R1 1.0 better than Aviator 900 ANC?

  1. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
  2. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+10%

Why is Aviator 900 ANC better than R1 1.0?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · R1 1.0: Yes
  2. Weight386 g vs 332 g+16%
Specifications

Side by side

OLLO R1 1.0OLLO R1 1.0≈ $410
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency5 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω36 Ω
Sensitivity110 dB119 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Head tracking—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones—6
Battery & charging
Battery life—60 h
Battery life with ANC—50 h
Charging time1 h—
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Bluetooth codecs—LC3
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight386 g332 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBrown, BlackTrue Black, Tortoise
Features
Wear detection (auto pause)—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare