How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold vs Aviator 900 ANC

Meze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold vs Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC

What 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold does better (3) and where Aviator 900 ANC wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Meze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
3 advantages≈ $350
vs
Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC
Skullcandy · 2025Aviator 900 ANC
6.5Score
1 advantage≈ $320
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls6.8

Why is 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold better than Aviator 900 ANC?

  1. Weight260 g vs 332 g+28%
  2. Lowest frequency15 Hz vs 20 Hz+33%
  3. Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+25%

Why is Aviator 900 ANC better than 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency15 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency25,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω36 Ω
Sensitivity103 dB119 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Head tracking—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones—6
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—60 h
Battery life with ANC—50 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Bluetooth codecs—LC3
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight260 g332 g
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Foldable—Yes
Colours—True Black, Tortoise
Features
Wear detection (auto pause)—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare