How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Aviator 900 ANC vs WH-1000XM6

Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC vs Sony WH-1000XM6

What Aviator 900 ANC does better (3) and where WH-1000XM6 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC
Skullcandy · 2025Aviator 900 ANC
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
vs
Sony WH-1000XM6
Sony · 2025WH-1000XM6
6.5Score
5 advantages≈ $340
2.9Sound8.0
6.8Noise control & calls7.8
7.4Battery3.9
4.8Connectivity6.3

Why is Aviator 900 ANC better than WH-1000XM6?

  1. Battery life60 h vs 40 h+50%
  2. Battery life with ANC50 h vs 30 h+67%
  3. Driver size40 mm vs 30 mm+33%

Why is WH-1000XM6 better than Aviator 900 ANC?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Aviator 900 ANC: Yes
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 4 Hz5×
  3. Weight332 g vs 254 g+31%
  4. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  5. LDACNo · Aviator 900 ANC: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sony WH-1000XM6Sony WH-1000XM6≈ $3406.5
Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz4 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance36 Ω48 Ω
Sensitivity119 dB103 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Head trackingYes—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones6—
Battery & charging
Battery life60 h40 h
Battery life with ANC50 h30 h
Charging time—3.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 4 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLC3LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight332 g254 g
FoldableYesYes
ColoursTrue Black, Tortoise—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Wear detection (auto pause)Yes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare