vs
8.3Battery5.0
7.6Build & features3.1
Why is FALCON Pro better than EAH-AZ70W?
- Battery life10 h vs 7.5 h+33%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · EAH-AZ70W: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
- aptXYes · EAH-AZ70W: No
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
- Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+20%
- Earbud weight (each)6 g vs 7 g+17%
Why is EAH-AZ70W better than FALCON Pro?
- Driver size6 mm vs 10 mm+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 24,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 7.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 6.5 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6 g | 7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Jabra Elite 7 ActivevsNoble Audio FALCON Pro7.88.7vs
Noble Audio FALCON ProvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vs
Noble Audio FALCON ProvsEarFun Free 2Svs
Noble Audio FALCON ProvsEarFun Air8.78.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsTechnics EAH-AZ70W5.95.6
vsShure AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-AvsTechnics EAH-AZ70W5.95.6