vs
8.3Battery6.1
Why is FALCON Pro better than h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800?
- Battery life10 h vs 8 h+25%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800: No
- aptXYes · h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800: No
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
- Charging time1 h vs 1.5 h+50%
- Earbud weight (each)6 g vs 7.6 g+27%
Why is h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 better than FALCON Pro?
h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 24,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| NFC pairing | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6 g | 7.6 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Jabra Elite 7 ActivevsNoble Audio FALCON Pro7.88.7
vs
Noble Audio FALCON ProvsEarFun Free 2S
vs
Noble Audio FALCON ProvsEarFun Air8.78.7
vs
Apple AirPods ProvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Apple AirPods (3rd Gen)vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
