Why is Chu II better than WI-C100?
- Driver size10 mm vs 9 mm+11%
Why is WI-C100 better than Chu II?
WI-C100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Neckband |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 9 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 280 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 120 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 25 h |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 20 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
