vs
2.4Battery8.5
Why is TAA5608BK/00 better than WI-C100?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is WI-C100 better than TAA5608BK/00?
- Battery life6 h vs 25 h4.2×
- Lowest frequency130 Hz vs 20 Hz6.5×
- Charging time6 h vs 3 h2×
- Highest frequency16,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Bone conduction | Neckband |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 9 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 130 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 16,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 8 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 88 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 25 h |
| Charging time | 6 h | 3 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 20 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
