Why is Tune 305C USB better than Chu II?
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- Driver size12.5 mm vs 10 mm+25%
Why is Chu II better than Tune 305C USB?
Chu II has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12.5 mm | 10 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 280 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | 120 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 15 g | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
