vs
2.1Build & features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Stanmore IIISRS-XG300
| Stanmore III | SRS-XG300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 203 mm | 138 mm | +65 mm |
| Width | 350 mm | 318 mm | +32 mm |
| Depth | 188 mm | 136 mm | +52 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Stanmore III better than SRS-XG300?
Stanmore III has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is SRS-XG300 better than Stanmore III?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx7
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 80 W | — |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | Stereo |
| Lowest frequency | 45 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 25 h |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 4,250 g | — |
| Width | 350 mm | 318 mm |
| Height | 203 mm | 138 mm |
| Depth | 188 mm | 136 mm |
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
| Light effects | — | Yes |
