How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Oskar vs SRS-XG300

faller Oskar vs Sony SRS-XG300

What Oskar does better (0) and where SRS-XG300 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

faller Oskar
faller · 2022Oskar
0 advantages≈ $210
vs
Sony SRS-XG300
Sony · 2022SRS-XG300
9.4Score
1 advantage≈ $230
Higher score
5.9Battery8.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

OskarSRS-XG300
240 × 10260318 × 138136
OskarSRS-XG300Difference
Height102 mm138 mm−36 mm
Width240 mm318 mm−78 mm
Depth60 mm136 mm−76 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Oskar better than SRS-XG300?

Oskar has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is SRS-XG300 better than Oskar?

  1. Battery life16 h vs 25 h+56%
Specifications

Side by side

faller Oskarfaller Oskar≈ $210
Sony SRS-XG300Sony SRS-XG300≈ $2309.4
Sound
Output power4 W—
Speaker channels2.0Stereo
Channel count2—
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life16 h25 h
Battery capacity3,350 mAh—
Charging time4 h—
Power bank function—Yes
Mains poweredNoYes
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.2
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Optical inputYes—
Design & build
Weight770 g—
Width240 mm318 mm
Height102 mm138 mm
Depth60 mm136 mm
Protection rating—IP67
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx7
Dust protection (IP)—6
ColoursGrey—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
Light effects—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare