How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. YU4 vs Stanmore III

Kanto YU4 vs Marshall Stanmore III

What YU4 does better (2) and where Stanmore III wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Kanto YU4
Kanto · 2022YU4
2 advantages
vs
Marshall Stanmore III
Marshall · 2022Stanmore III
4.6Score
3 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
6.5Sound7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

YU4Stanmore III
140 × 220190350 × 203188
YU4Stanmore IIIDifference
Height220 mm203 mm+17 mm
Width140 mm350 mm−210 mm
Depth190 mm188 mm+2 mm
Weight3,200 g4,250 g−1,050 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is YU4 better than Stanmore III?

  1. Weight3,200 g vs 4,250 g+33%
  2. aptXYes · Stanmore III: No

Why is Stanmore III better than YU4?

  1. Output power70 W vs 80 W+14%
  2. Bluetooth version4 vs 5.2+30%
  3. Lowest frequency60 Hz vs 45 Hz+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power70 W80 W
Speaker channels2.0Stereo
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency60 Hz45 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version45.2
Bluetooth codecsaptX, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
LE Audio—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
HDMI eARC / ARC—Yes
Optical inputYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight3,200 g4,250 g
Width140 mm350 mm
Height220 mm203 mm
Depth190 mm188 mm
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx0
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare