How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Stanmore III vs nuBoxx A-125 pro

Marshall Stanmore III vs Nubert nuBoxx A-125 pro

What Stanmore III does better (3) and where nuBoxx A-125 pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Stanmore III
Marshall · 2022Stanmore III
4.6Score
3 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Nubert nuBoxx A-125 pro
Nubert · 2022nuBoxx A-125 pro
3 advantages≈ $440
7.7Sound7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Stanmore IIInuBoxx A-125 pro
350 × 203188135 × 245200
Stanmore IIInuBoxx A-125 proDifference
Height203 mm245 mm−42 mm
Width350 mm135 mm+215 mm
Depth188 mm200 mm−12 mm
Weight4,250 g3,700 g+550 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Stanmore III better than nuBoxx A-125 pro?

  1. Output power80 W vs 50 W+60%
  2. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
  3. Lowest frequency45 Hz vs 50 Hz+11%

Why is nuBoxx A-125 pro better than Stanmore III?

  1. aptXNo · Stanmore III: Yes
  2. Weight4,250 g vs 3,700 g+15%
  3. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power80 W50 W
Speaker channelsStereo2.0
Channel count—2
Lowest frequency45 Hz50 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz22,000 Hz
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesNo
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25
Bluetooth codecsSBCaptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoYes
LDACNoNo
LE AudioYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
HDMI eARC / ARCYes—
Optical input—Yes
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight4,250 g3,700 g
Width350 mm135 mm
Height203 mm245 mm
Depth188 mm200 mm
Water resistance (IPx)IPx0—
Features
Remote control—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare