vs
7.9Noise control & calls4.0
Why is MONITOR III A.N.C. better than Luan?
- Active noise cancellingYes · Luan: No
- Weight250 g vs 354 g+42%
Why is Luan better than MONITOR III A.N.C.?
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- Driver size32 mm vs 50 mm+56%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 32 mm | 50 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 35 Ω | 38 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 100 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 70 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 250 g | 354 g |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
