How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Middleton vs SRS-XG300

Marshall Middleton vs Sony SRS-XG300

What Middleton does better (1) and where SRS-XG300 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Middleton
Marshall · 2022Middleton
7.0Score
1 advantage≈ $180
vs
Sony SRS-XG300
Sony · 2022SRS-XG300
9.2Score
4 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
6.2Battery8.9
5.2Build & features5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

MiddletonSRS-XG300
230 × 10995318 × 138136
MiddletonSRS-XG300Difference
Height109 mm138 mm−29 mm
Width230 mm318 mm−88 mm
Depth95 mm136 mm−41 mm
Weight1,800 g3,000 g−1,200 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Middleton better than SRS-XG300?

  1. Weight1,800 g vs 3,000 g+67%

Why is SRS-XG300 better than Middleton?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 25 h+25%
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Middleton: Yes
  3. Lowest frequency50 Hz vs 20 Hz2.5×
  4. LDACNo · Middleton: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sony SRS-XG300Sony SRS-XG300≈ $2009.2
Sound
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size76.2 mm—
Output power60 W—
Speaker channels2.0Stereo
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency50 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h25 h
Charging time4.5 h—
Quick charge (claimed)20 min → 2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Power bank functionYesYes
Mains poweredNoYes
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.2
Bluetooth codecsSBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight1,800 g3,000 g
Width230 mm318 mm
Height109 mm138 mm
Depth95 mm136 mm
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairingYesYes
Light effects—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare