How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Oskar vs Middleton

faller Oskar vs Marshall Middleton

What Oskar does better (2) and where Middleton wins (2) — every spec side by side.

faller Oskar
faller · 2022Oskar
2 advantages≈ $210
vs
Marshall Middleton
Marshall · 2022Middleton
6.9Score
2 advantages≈ $180
Higher score
5.9Battery6.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

OskarMiddleton
240 × 10260230 × 10995
OskarMiddletonDifference
Height102 mm109 mm−7 mm
Width240 mm230 mm+10 mm
Depth60 mm95 mm−35 mm
Weight770 g1,800 g−1,030 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Oskar better than Middleton?

  1. Weight770 g vs 1,800 g2.3×
  2. Charging time4 h vs 4.5 h+12%

Why is Middleton better than Oskar?

  1. Output power4 W vs 60 W15×
  2. Battery life16 h vs 20 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

faller Oskarfaller Oskar≈ $210
Sound
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—76.2 mm
Output power4 W60 W
Speaker channels2.02.0
Channel count22
Lowest frequency—50 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life16 h20 h
Battery capacity3,350 mAh—
Charging time4 h4.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)—20 min → 2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Power bank function—Yes
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.1
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Optical inputYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight770 g1,800 g
Width240 mm230 mm
Height102 mm109 mm
Depth60 mm95 mm
Protection rating—IP67
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx7
Dust protection (IP)—6
ColoursGrey—
Features
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare