How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Kilburn III vs Session 900

Marshall Kilburn III vs Skullcandy Session 900

What Kilburn III does better (3) and where Session 900 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Kilburn III
Marshall · 2025Kilburn III
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ $300
vs
Skullcandy Session 900
Skullcandy · 2026Session 900
9.0Score
4 advantages≈ $150
Higher score
6.8Sound6.9
8.9Battery9.2
4.9Connectivity9.3
2.4Build & features5.5

Why is Kilburn III better than Session 900?

  1. Battery life50 h vs 49 h+2%
  2. Lowest frequency45 Hz vs 50 Hz+11%
  3. Driver size101.6 mm vs 93 mm+9%

Why is Session 900 better than Kilburn III?

  1. Weight2,800 g vs 1,050 g2.7×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
  3. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
  4. Dust protection (IP)5 vs 6+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size101.6 mm93 mm
Output power50 W50 W
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency45 Hz50 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h49 h
Charging time3 h—
Quick charge (claimed)20 min → 8 h10 min → 3.5 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Power bank functionYesYes
Mains poweredNo—
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.36
Bluetooth codecsLC3, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYesYes
AuracastYesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight2,800 g1,050 g
Width273 mm—
Height150 mm—
Depth169 mm—
Protection ratingIP54IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx7
Dust protection (IP)56
Colours—Cement, True Black, Primer
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare