How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. QS20 vs Kilburn III

Edifier QS20 vs Marshall Kilburn III

What QS20 does better (2) and where Kilburn III wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Edifier QS20
Edifier · 2025QS20
2 advantages
vs
Marshall Kilburn III
Marshall · 2025Kilburn III
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
2.9Sound6.8

Why is QS20 better than Kilburn III?

  1. Weight327 g vs 2,800 g8.6×
  2. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%

Why is Kilburn III better than QS20?

  1. Output power6 W vs 50 W8.3×
  2. Driver size43 mm vs 101.6 mm2.4×
  3. Lowest frequency87 Hz vs 45 Hz+93%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size43 mm101.6 mm
Output power6 W50 W
Speaker channels—2.0
Channel count—2
Lowest frequency87 Hz45 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Stereo—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—50 h
Charging time—3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—20 min → 8 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Power bank function—Yes
Mains powered—No
Battery powered (portable)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.3
Bluetooth codecsSBCLC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight327 g2,800 g
Width—273 mm
Height—150 mm
Depth—169 mm
Protection rating—IP54
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare