How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ES300 vs Kilburn III

Edifier ES300 vs Marshall Kilburn III

What ES300 does better (3) and where Kilburn III wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Edifier ES300
Edifier · 2025ES300
3 advantages
vs
Marshall Kilburn III
Marshall · 2025Kilburn III
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
9.0Sound6.8

Why is ES300 better than Kilburn III?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Kilburn III: No
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  3. LDACYes · Kilburn III: No

Why is Kilburn III better than ES300?

  1. Output power45 W vs 50 W+11%
  2. Weight3,700 g vs 2,800 g+32%
  3. Lowest frequency56 Hz vs 45 Hz+24%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—101.6 mm
Output power45 W50 W
Speaker channels—2.0
Channel count—2
Lowest frequency56 Hz45 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Stereo—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—50 h
Charging time—3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—20 min → 8 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Power bank function—Yes
Mains powered—No
Battery powered (portable)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCLC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
AirPlayYes—
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight3,700 g2,800 g
Width—273 mm
Height—150 mm
Depth—169 mm
Protection rating—IP54
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare