How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h vs Century TAH2000

LogiLink Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h vs Philips Century TAH2000

What Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h does better (2) and where Century TAH2000 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

LogiLink Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h
7.7Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
vs
Philips Century TAH2000
Philips · 2025Century TAH2000
1 advantage≈ $19
5.3Battery4.0

Why is Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h better than Century TAH2000?

  1. Battery life40 h vs 26 h+54%
  2. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is Century TAH2000 better than Bluetooth 6.0 Kopfhörer Hybrid ANC, kabellos, 40h?

  1. Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB123 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life40 h26 h
Charging time2.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Design & build
Weight—80 g
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare