vs
8.7Battery4.0
Why is Bowie D05 better than Century TAH2000?
- Battery life70 h vs 26 h2.7×
Why is Century TAH2000 better than Bowie D05?
- Weight209 g vs 80 g2.6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 123 dB |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 70 h | 26 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 80 g |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL Junior 320vsBaseus Bowie D05
vs
Lazerbuilt Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth HeadphonesvsBaseus Bowie D05
vs
Skullcandy Grom WiredvsBaseus Bowie D05
vs
Belkin SoundForm Mini 2 WirelessvsPhilips Century TAH2000
vs
Philips TAK2000vsPhilips Century TAH2000
vs
Lazerbuilt Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth HeadphonesvsPhilips Century TAH2000
