How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. KH-KZ30 vs TAK4206

Kenwood KH-KZ30 vs Philips TAK4206

What KH-KZ30 does better (2) and where TAK4206 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood KH-KZ30
Kenwood · 2022KH-KZ30
2 advantages≈ $30
vs
Philips TAK4206
Philips · 2021TAK4206
4.1Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
4.5Battery4.2

Why is KH-KZ30 better than TAK4206?

  1. Battery life35 h vs 28 h+25%
  2. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%

Why is TAK4206 better than KH-KZ30?

  1. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
  2. Driver size30 mm vs 32 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAK4206Philips TAK4206≈ $254.1
Sound
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size30 mm32 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—83 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h28 h
Charging time3 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight157 g—
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare