How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 520BT vs KH-KZ30

JBL Tune 520BT vs Kenwood KH-KZ30

What Tune 520BT does better (3) and where KH-KZ30 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 520BT
JBL · 2023Tune 520BT
4.9Score
3 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
vs
Kenwood KH-KZ30
Kenwood · 2022KH-KZ30
0 advantages≈ $30
7.1Battery4.5

Why is Tune 520BT better than KH-KZ30?

  1. Battery life57 h vs 35 h+63%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
  3. Driver size33 mm vs 30 mm+10%

Why is KH-KZ30 better than Tune 520BT?

KH-KZ30 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 520BTJBL Tune 520BT≈ $304.9
Sound
FitOn-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size33 mm30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance30 Ω—
Sensitivity102 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNo—
Battery & charging
Battery life57 h35 h
Charging time2 h3 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight157 g157 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare