How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HA-KD10W vs TAK4206

JVC HA-KD10W vs Philips TAK4206

What HA-KD10W does better (0) and where TAK4206 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

JVC HA-KD10W
JVC · 2021HA-KD10W
0 advantages≈ $35
vs
Philips TAK4206
Philips · 2021TAK4206
4.1Score
3 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
2.3Battery4.2

Why is HA-KD10W better than TAK4206?

HA-KD10W has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAK4206 better than HA-KD10W?

  1. Battery life16 h vs 28 h+75%
  2. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
  3. Driver size30 mm vs 32 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAK4206Philips TAK4206≈ $254.1
Sound
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size30 mm32 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—83 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life16 h28 h
Charging time3 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight110 g—
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare