How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ORA4 vs Kilburn III

Kanto ORA4 vs Marshall Kilburn III

What ORA4 does better (2) and where Kilburn III wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kanto ORA4
Kanto · 2025ORA4
2 advantages≈ $450
vs
Marshall Kilburn III
Marshall · 2025Kilburn III
6.8Score
2 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
Dimensions

Size comparison

ORA4Kilburn III
120 × 210170273 × 150169
ORA4Kilburn IIIDifference
Height210 mm150 mm+60 mm
Width120 mm273 mm−153 mm
Depth170 mm169 mm+1 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is ORA4 better than Kilburn III?

  1. Output power70 W vs 50 W+40%
  2. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+10%

Why is Kilburn III better than ORA4?

  1. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.3+6%
  2. Lowest frequency60 Hz vs 45 Hz+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Kanto ORA4Kanto ORA4≈ $450
Sound
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—101.6 mm
Output power70 W50 W
Speaker channels—2.0
Channel count—2
Lowest frequency60 Hz45 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Stereo—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—50 h
Charging time—3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—20 min → 8 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Power bank function—Yes
Mains poweredYesNo
Battery powered (portable)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.3
Bluetooth codecs—LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-C—Yes
USB audioYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—2,800 g
Width120 mm273 mm
Height210 mm150 mm
Depth170 mm169 mm
Protection rating—IP54
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare