Why is HA-A4T better than TAQ2000?
- Battery life7.5 h vs 7 h+7%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 100 Hz5×
Why is TAQ2000 better than HA-A4T?
TAQ2000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Semi-in-ear (open) | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 100 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 113 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 28 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 51 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 48 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | 4 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
