vs
Why is HA-A4T better than MeloBuds A30 kabellose Ohrhörer ANC, Bluetooth 6.0?
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
Why is MeloBuds A30 kabellose Ohrhörer ANC, Bluetooth 6.0 better than HA-A4T?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · HA-A4T: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- LDACNo · HA-A4T: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Semi-in-ear (open) | — |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver size | 12 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | LDAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Colours | — | White |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JVC HA-A4TvsJVC HA-A22T5.27.0vs
JVC HA-A4TvsJVC HA-A23T5.27.6
vsPhilips TAT3000vsJVC HA-A4T
vsQCY MeloBuds A30 Kabellose Ohrhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 LDAC IPX5 goldenvsJVC HA-A4Tvs
JVC HA-A4TvsBelkin SoundForm ClearFit AUC013btBK
vs
Fresh 'n Rebel Twins Fuse 2vsQCY MeloBuds A30 kabellose Ohrhörer ANC, Bluetooth 6.0