vs
Why is SoundForm ClearFit AUC013btBK better than HA-A4T?
- Battery life8 h vs 7.5 h+7%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Driver size14.2 mm vs 12 mm+18%
Why is HA-A4T better than SoundForm ClearFit AUC013btBK?
HA-A4T has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Semi-in-ear (open) |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver size | 14.2 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 7.5 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Fresh 'n Rebel Twins Fuse 2vsBelkin SoundForm ClearFit AUC013btBK
vs
JVC HA-A4TvsJVC HA-A22T5.27.0vs
JVC HA-A4TvsJVC HA-A23T5.27.6
vsPhilips TAT3000vsJVC HA-A4T
vsQCY MeloBuds A30 Kabellose Ohrhörer ANC Bluetooth 6.0 LDAC IPX5 goldenvsJVC HA-A4Tvs
JVC HA-A4TvsQCY MeloBuds A30 kabellose Ohrhörer ANC, Bluetooth 6.0