How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 520C vs HiTune S3 WS209

JBL Tune 520C vs Ugreen HiTune S3 WS209

What Tune 520C does better (1) and where HiTune S3 WS209 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 520C
JBL · 2025Tune 520C
1 advantage≈ $16
vs
Ugreen HiTune S3 WS209
Ugreen · 2025HiTune S3 WS209
5.1Score
1 advantage≈ $19
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls9.2

Why is Tune 520C better than HiTune S3 WS209?

  1. Driver size33 mm vs 12 mm2.8×

Why is HiTune S3 WS209 better than Tune 520C?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Tune 520C: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size33 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance30 Ω—
Sensitivity102 dB—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Battery & charging
Battery life—7 h
Charging time—3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecs—AAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight157 g—
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
FoldableYes—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare