vs
9.3Battery8.2
Why is Tune 255NC better than Hear-scape HP-H300BT?
- Battery life12 h vs 9.5 h+26%
Why is Hear-scape HP-H300BT better than Tune 255NC?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
- Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 122 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 12 h | 9.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 12 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 48 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 65 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 52 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Buds 8 Provsradius Hear-scape HP-H300BT
vsSoundcore P42ivsradius Hear-scape HP-H300BT
vsAudio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsradius Hear-scape HP-H300BTvs
radius Hear-scape HP-H300BTvsMotorola moto buds 2 plusvs
radius Hear-scape HP-H300BTvsJVC HA-A30T3
vsOPPO Enco Air5 Provsradius Hear-scape HP-H300BT