How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TUNE 115BT vs TAA5608BK/00

JBL TUNE 115BT vs Philips TAA5608BK/00

What TUNE 115BT does better (4) and where TAA5608BK/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL TUNE 115BT
JBL · 2020TUNE 115BT
4 advantages≈ $25
vs
Philips TAA5608BK/00
Philips · 2023TAA5608BK/00
1 advantage≈ $30
2.9Battery2.4

Why is TUNE 115BT better than TAA5608BK/00?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 6 h+33%
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 130 Hz6.5×
  3. Charging time2 h vs 6 h3×
  4. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 16,000 Hz+25%

Why is TAA5608BK/00 better than TUNE 115BT?

  1. Bluetooth version4.2 vs 5.3+26%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earBone conduction
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size8.6 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz130 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz16,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω8 Ω
Sensitivity102 dB88 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h6 h
Charging time2 h6 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version4.25.3
Bluetooth codecsSBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Weight19 g—
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare