vs
9.0Battery2.9
Why is ATH-CKS330XBT better than TUNE 115BT?
- Battery life20 h vs 8 h2.5×
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
- Bluetooth version5 vs 4.2+19%
- Highest frequency30,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+50%
Why is TUNE 115BT better than ATH-CKS330XBT?
- Weight24 g vs 19 g+26%
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 8.6 mm+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Neckband | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 30,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | 102 dB |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 4.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 24 g | 19 g |
| Protection rating | IPX2 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
