How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. W64 vs HiTune S3 WS209

Hoco W64 vs Ugreen HiTune S3 WS209

What W64 does better (1) and where HiTune S3 WS209 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Hoco W64
Hoco · 2026W64
1 advantage≈ $16
vs
Ugreen HiTune S3 WS209
Ugreen · 2025HiTune S3 WS209
5.4Score
1 advantage≈ $19
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls9.2

Why is W64 better than HiTune S3 WS209?

  1. Driver size32 mm vs 12 mm2.7×

Why is HiTune S3 WS209 better than W64?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · W64: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Hoco W64Hoco W64≈ $16
Sound
Fit—Open-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size32 mm12 mm
Number of drivers1—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Battery & charging
Battery life—7 h
Battery capacity300 mAh—
Charging time—3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecs—AAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Design & build
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
FoldableYes—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare