Why is Clam Ace better than WH-CH530?
- Battery life60 h vs 55 h+9%
Why is WH-CH530 better than Clam Ace?
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 30 mm |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 60 h | 55 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 50 h | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 10 min → 3 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 150 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
